BAF NEWS

White House defends Witkoff after leaked call

The October 2025 Witkoff Kremlin call transcript is now central to the White House defense of Steve Witkoff. After the steve witkoff leaked transcript surfaced, officials did not dispute its authenticity, according to AP News and other outlets. Trump called the approach “standard” and added, “That’s what a dealmaker does.”

White House communications director Steven Cheung said the envoy speaks to both sides “nearly every day.” “This story proves one thing: Special Envoy Witkoff talks to officials in both Russia and Ukraine nearly every day to achieve peace,” he said. You might be surprised that the statement arrived as calls for Witkoff’s removal mounted.

What the October 2025 Witkoff Kremlin call transcript shows

According to reports on the yuri ushakov call, Witkoff urged the Kremlin aide to congratulate Trump on the Gaza ceasefire. He also suggested praising Trump as “a man of peace” before pivoting to Ukraine specifics. The transcript references a 20-point framework modeled on the Gaza deal.

The yuri ushakov call reportedly lasted only minutes but set the tone. Here’s the twist: Witkoff framed Putin as open to a deal and said Russia “has always wanted a peace deal,” according to international summaries. The steve witkoff leaked transcript also shows a bid to schedule leader-level contact.

Timeline: Oct. 14 call to Trump–Putin conversation

Witkoff pushed for a Trump–Putin conversation before the zelenskyy white house visit. Ushakov agreed Putin would offer congratulations to smooth the path. The leaders held the trump putin call october 16, one day before Zelenskyy’s Washington meeting.

That sequence matters, because it framed momentum before high-stakes photo ops. Officials later described the trump putin call october 16 as productive, though few specifics emerged. Meanwhile, the zelenskyy white house visit proceeded under tighter expectations.

Proposed terms in the transcript

The leaked notes suggest the peace concept might require Ukraine to cede Donetsk. Witkoff also floated “Donetsk and maybe a land swap somewhere,” according to available reports. That possibility echoes Russian territorial demands.

Any such trade-off would be explosive in Kyiv and in Europe. Critics say it rewards aggression. Supporters argue it reflects battlefield realities and may end the killing.

How the October 2025 Witkoff Kremlin call transcript ties to the U.S. proposal

Several elements align with an emerging U.S. plan critics call tilted toward Moscow. Early drafts, described as an ukraine peace plan 28-point outline, reportedly included territorial concessions and military limits. Later versions were narrowed to 19 points, but the thrust drew fire.

Reports link the transcript’s 20-point framing to the broader ukraine peace plan 28-point effort. Some accounts say the plan barred NATO membership and shrank Ukraine’s forces. The White House says talks remain fluid.

Backlash from critics, including Republicans

Republican Rep. Don Bacon said Witkoff favors Russia and should be sidelined. “He cannot be trusted to lead these negotiations,” Bacon argued. Others warned the optics hand leverage to Moscow.

What no one is mentioning: critics and allies are reading the same transcript to opposite ends. Backers see hard-nosed bargaining. Detractors see preemptive concessions.

White House stance and next assignments

Trump defended Witkoff as a dealmaker and doubled down. He said he will send Witkoff to meet Putin next, while Army Secretary Dan Driscoll will meet Ukrainians. Those moves aim to keep channels open even as scrutiny intensifies.

Supporters say this is how deals get made. Here’s the twist: shuttle diplomacy without firm guardrails could tilt terms toward Moscow. The outcome hinges on what gets written down.

What’s next

Witkoff’s meeting with Putin and Driscoll’s engagement with Ukrainians will shape the next draft. The U.S.-drafted proposal remains under negotiation, and details could still shift. Nevertheless, the October 2025 Witkoff Kremlin call transcript will shadow every step.

For now, watch two markers: whether Kyiv publicly entertains a territorial discussion, and whether Moscow puts verifiable commitments on paper. If both happen, talks may accelerate. If not, pressure will rise on all sides.